As any academic will know the crucial thing to being successful is to publish. But that isn’t really the whole story – you have to publish something that hasn’t been published before saying something that hasn’t been said before in a way that no one else has thought of saying it … or do you.

Last week was rather strained work wise, time wise, stress wise  (you get the gist) so the blog went to the wall as I wailed my way through the week. Why? Because of  the discovery of two articles, a book and a PhD thesis that I had hitherto failed to uncover in my multimillion internet/library trawls, all of which seemed to be my thesis in print. So convinced was I that my ‘originality’ had been scuppered I was afraid to read them, it was just too demoralising.

When I finally plucked up the courage and confronted the damn things, instead of just assuming I was done for I found, to my delight, that they not only confirmed that my assessment of the material I am working with was spot on, but that the manner in which I am approaching the project is in fact a unique one. Much of the material  repeated stuff I already knew and had sourced from other material, and the original stuff that these papers presented would help my project rather than hinder it. The despair lifted somewhat.

In the midst of the despair I was reminded of a conversation I had with El Secondo a while back, about lacking originality; she said it is rare for anyone to say anything completely new, the key is in the way you fit all the pieces that already exist together and present it, whether or not that leads to an ‘original’ conclusion. Engaging with other scholarship is crucial to the process. This encouraged me. Literary criticism is a difficult field to be original in, you usually find that some other academic has said what you are trying to say and much more eloquently – so what do you do? You quote them, you reference them and you use their scholarship to enhance your own. The reciprocity is there in your promotion of their original work. It’s not a bad system. It ensures that good work gets the spotlight it deserves and keeps scholarship fresh and alive – I have come to view my thesis as a conversation with other academics in my field, and as such it has become a much more fluid piece that it was.


Hopefully this week will be more on track than off piste … 


3 thoughts on “Research – When it seems it’s all been said before.

  1. Hey congratulations – sounds like things are all coming together. I have found the writing you share about your experience of working towards your PhD really enlightening. Your very honest about your highs and your lows and I’m sure your readers appreciate it. Interesting to think about your writing as a conversation with academics – what a great way to approach things. Good luck to you.

  2. Your post was very timely and an interesting read! The fear of unoriginality or not having anything new to say, is one that bothers me too. I lack the confidence to believe that my topic is , original enough etc and apparently this shows in my writing. I need to get past this, but am aware this will come with practice, so I need to write more. I can’t wait now to attempt to have a ‘conversation’ about my topic with other scholors via a Phd. (Just the small matter of getting accepted into my University of choice! simples)

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s